Disciplinary dialogues:
ontological and epistemological tensions
Keywords:
archaeology and anthropology, polyphonies and inequalities, professional praxisAbstract
This Dossier brings together papers that face the challenge of building alternatives to approaches that follow guidelines drawn from capitalocentric modernity based on dichotomies or oppositions rather than on relationships in contexts of socio-cultural diversity (and, therefore, economically and politically implicated). From the social sciences, the articles included in this volume expose experiences in different regions of the country that bet on new ways of understanding and explaining the relationality between objects and subjects, seeking to enable more sensitive and committed scientific and professional practices. The need to deepen discussions about a professional work that is nourished by the plurality of voices around the modes of perception and relationship with our territories, our memories, our knowledge and senses, which recognizes the colonial heritage and neocolonialist interests but also opens a hopeful universe for resistance and re-existence, is evident. Within this framework, different disciplinary perspectives converge in a production that seeks to problematize the construction of interpretations about our social reality, its anchorage in the past, and a present crossed by conflict, dispossession and inequalities.
ARK CAICYT: https://id.caicyt.gov.ar/ark:/s16688090/ckcnac76m
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright. The magazine guarantees the unpublished and original nature of the articles received and sent for evaluation.
Authors transfer the publication rights of their manuscript to the journal, on a non-exclusive basis, for publication in electronic format. The authors










